"Empire" and "Imperialism state" have quite different conceptions

Because ,"Empire" and "Imperialism state" have quite different conceptions a lot of people can 't  understand  the writing of Japanese Marxist Koujin Karatani well.

For instance,who can understand that prewar Japan was not  an"Empire" but "Imperialism state" ,though   prewar Japan  called oneself an"Empire"?

Here, it will  be made clearly .

-  An empire is an union of multiracial by  rules of some  philosophy,or  some law, or  some religion.  An example  is  the Roman Empire .

-  An imperialism state  is  a style  of a national state 
expanded by capitalism logic, and  ruling another race. The one that grew  great  power exceptionally  among  some imperialism states is called a hegemony state. Up to now, the Netherlands and Britain and the United States have played the role of the hegemony state. There is no true hegemony state now.

- An imperialism state doesn't become an empire. On the other hand, the empire makes it to an imperialism state.

- The United States is one imperialism state  that falls from a hegemony state . Antonio Negri called the United States an
empire because  the United States kept  a decision of the U.N. at the Gulf War 1990. And  the United States was pleased. Afterward ,Negri was proven to be wrong by an independent action in Iraq War2003  of the United States.

- However,when  national states gather like EU,  a new empire is made.  And Japan Communist Party calls EU as capitalism under  the  democratic rule .

- But the empire named EU  will changes  to a new imperialism state  though competitions  against  the United States and Japan, China, etc.

- China, Russia, India, and the sphere of Islam have
possibility of appearing as empires.

And a new global warfare will haveareality  when these new empires make it to imperialismstate  in the capitalism competition.

-  The global warfare of the 21st century will become a crueller war that purely fights over the hegemony though the global warfare of the 20th century was a territory acquisition war to acquire the outside of capitalism by the imperialism states  .

- The human race will survive by the highly developed new United Nations's being established afterwards if the war happens. If it cannot be done, it is ruined.

- If pacifism succeeds moreover, and the global warfare is held off, the highly developed United Nations will be established ,too.

- After all, the United Nations develops when the global warfare happens or the global warfare can be held off, the world republic can peel off, and, in any case, it is caused to advance one step. This is inevitable of the history for the human race to survive.

- The world faces "World federation" and "World republic" that Kant viewed.

Well, subjects of the entire sentences start having an extremely peculiar history by China, and clarifying keeping the empire from the age of [**] from China the feature theme of this magazine. It is assumed that the rule is Confucism.

Even if China changes this ahead, being maintained, and not separating into a lot of national nations are the expectation of the author in the appearance of the Confucianism empire and China.

The opinion of the specialist of a Chinese history is not collected.

It is assumed that it keeps it as an opinion of the handle valley there, and there is a part where the opinion of the handle valley of the Tibet problem cannot be understood.

Why is it at that says, "Han Chinese was reversely discriminated because it gave preferential treatment to the Tibet people and the Uighur people, and the Tibet Uighur problem was caused"?

Is it Han Chinese that demands the Tibet independence that lives in Tibet?It must be confusion of the handle valley.