« 2011年12月 | トップページ | 2013年4月 »

2012年5月

2012年5月18日 (金)

Shoichi Inoue and Tetsuzo Fuwa

Tetsuzo Fuwa is making remarks on the existence of the feudalism revolution for 400 years from the Kamakura Shogunate to the Tokugawa Shogunate many times.

It was not to have proven the real existence of feudalism revolution by Mr. Fuwa who was not the specialist .

How about the real existence of the feudalism revolution?

Shoichi Inoue who always writes interesting and entertaining books has written this book some seriously.

The description of the history of current Japan especially emphasizes the Kamakura Shogunate approval .
It keeps describing the extreme misinterpretation ofTokyo's having built up a sturdy political power escaping from the influence of weak Kyoto by "Tokyo-centered history view".

The history of Japan synchronizes with the history of the world.

The Han and the Roman Empire represent the ancient times. TheMiddle
Ages follows them. Feudalism is  the alias of this age.

Neither Asuka, Nara nor the Heian era that is called ancient times of Japan are actually
ancient times. At this point, it was the Middle Ages when it had already reflected after
the Han empire had collapsed.

Therefore, the history of Japan has no ancient times ,and ,have started from the Middle Ages.

It is not unusual, and the clan societies around the great empire, that is, Germanic various families and Japan are examples for it.

Therefore, the Kamakura Shogunate approval is not a big incident that draw the Middle Ages from ancient times, and there were no difference between the court noble and the samurai. It is a kernel of "Tokyo -centered historical view" ideology.

Then,the modern ages began in Renaissance of Europe the15 century and in Song dynasty of China the 10th century ,and in Ounin War of Japan the 15th century.Japanese life pattern after that has not changed basically. The feature at the early modern age is a start of the tendency to forming national states opposite to the
empire that bundles multi races ,the rise of commerce, the development of the money economy, and multiracial.

As the reason, the approval of the government of Edo was not to completion of feudalism, but further deepening at the early modern age though not being written clearly by Mr. Inoue. It continues naturally while becoming the mother's womb of capitalism at the Meiji era.

I sympathize at basic posture because world history is linked with the history of Japan.

"The feudalism revolution" is a word representing the "Tokyo -centered historical view in which Mr. Fuwa has been caught.

| | コメント (0) | トラックバック (0)

2012年5月14日 (月)

"Empire" and "Imperialism state" have quite different conceptions

Because ,"Empire" and "Imperialism state" have quite different conceptions a lot of people can 't  understand  the writing of Japanese Marxist Koujin Karatani well.

For instance,who can understand that prewar Japan was not  an"Empire" but "Imperialism state" ,though   prewar Japan  called oneself an"Empire"?

Here, it will  be made clearly .

-  An empire is an union of multiracial by  rules of some  philosophy,or  some law, or  some religion.  An example  is  the Roman Empire .

-  An imperialism state  is  a style  of a national state 
expanded by capitalism logic, and  ruling another race. The one that grew  great  power exceptionally  among  some imperialism states is called a hegemony state. Up to now, the Netherlands and Britain and the United States have played the role of the hegemony state. There is no true hegemony state now.

- An imperialism state doesn't become an empire. On the other hand, the empire makes it to an imperialism state.

- The United States is one imperialism state  that falls from a hegemony state . Antonio Negri called the United States an
empire because  the United States kept  a decision of the U.N. at the Gulf War 1990. And  the United States was pleased. Afterward ,Negri was proven to be wrong by an independent action in Iraq War2003  of the United States.

- However,when  national states gather like EU,  a new empire is made.  And Japan Communist Party calls EU as capitalism under  the  democratic rule .

- But the empire named EU  will changes  to a new imperialism state  though competitions  against  the United States and Japan, China, etc.

- China, Russia, India, and the sphere of Islam have
possibility of appearing as empires.

And a new global warfare will haveareality  when these new empires make it to imperialismstate  in the capitalism competition.

-  The global warfare of the 21st century will become a crueller war that purely fights over the hegemony though the global warfare of the 20th century was a territory acquisition war to acquire the outside of capitalism by the imperialism states  .

- The human race will survive by the highly developed new United Nations's being established afterwards if the war happens. If it cannot be done, it is ruined.

- If pacifism succeeds moreover, and the global warfare is held off, the highly developed United Nations will be established ,too.

- After all, the United Nations develops when the global warfare happens or the global warfare can be held off, the world republic can peel off, and, in any case, it is caused to advance one step. This is inevitable of the history for the human race to survive.

- The world faces "World federation" and "World republic" that Kant viewed.

Well, subjects of the entire sentences start having an extremely peculiar history by China, and clarifying keeping the empire from the age of [**] from China the feature theme of this magazine. It is assumed that the rule is Confucism.

Even if China changes this ahead, being maintained, and not separating into a lot of national nations are the expectation of the author in the appearance of the Confucianism empire and China.

The opinion of the specialist of a Chinese history is not collected.

It is assumed that it keeps it as an opinion of the handle valley there, and there is a part where the opinion of the handle valley of the Tibet problem cannot be understood.

Why is it at that says, "Han Chinese was reversely discriminated because it gave preferential treatment to the Tibet people and the Uighur people, and the Tibet Uighur problem was caused"?

Is it Han Chinese that demands the Tibet independence that lives in Tibet?It must be confusion of the handle valley.

| | コメント (0) | トラックバック (0)

« 2011年12月 | トップページ | 2013年4月 »